Valley Link Transmission Project Cost Climbs to $5.1 Billion, Completion Delayed to 2031
A researcher has reported that the estimated cost for the Valley Link transmission project has risen to $5.1 billion, with the project's completion now expected in 2031. These updated figures and schedule delays provide counties along the route with grounds,…
Norfolk Portsmouth Newport News, VA, November 6, 2026 — The estimated cost for the Valley Link transmission project has increased to $5.1 billion, with its completion now projected for 2031, according to a recent report from a researcher.
The significant escalation in projected expenses and the revised timeline are providing counties situated along the project’s intended route with the basis to scrutinize the undertaking. These counties may leverage PJM’s established rules to question the necessity and the procedural aspects of the Valley Link transmission project.
The researcher’s report indicates a substantial rise in the financial commitment required for the project, pushing the total estimated cost to $5.1 billion. This figure represents a notable increase from previous estimates, though the specific prior cost was not detailed in the report. Furthermore, the anticipated completion date has been deferred to 2031, marking a delay in the project’s operational start.
The specific identity of the researcher who compiled this report was not provided. The report does not detail the exact grounds upon which counties can question the project, nor does it specify which counties have indicated intent to do so.
PJM, the regional transmission organization that coordinates the wholesale electricity markets and manages grid reliability in 13 states and the District of Columbia, operates under a set of rules governing transmission planning and project approval. The updated cost and schedule figures for the Valley Link project reportedly provide sufficient data points for these rules to be invoked by affected counties.
Details regarding specific PJM rules that might be relevant to such a challenge, or the particular questions counties might raise about the project’s necessity and process, were not elaborated upon in the information available.
The report also did not specify any immediate next steps or actions taken by the counties as a result of these updated figures and schedule projections. The outcome of any such review or questioning by the counties remains to be seen.
Story summarized from the original created by Tommy Turner on cardinalnews.org, see more information here.
Media gallery
